@article{10.22454/FamMed.2022.501410,
author = {Sanders, Mechelle and Fogarty, Colleen T. and Morley, Christopher P. and Schultz, Stephen and Devine, Mathew and Sridhar, Soumya B. and Fiscella, Kevin},
title = {Training Family Medicine Residents to Address the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Survey of Program Directors},
journal = {Family Medicine},
volume = {54},
number = {5},
year = {2022},
month = {5},
pages = {343-349},
doi = {10.22454/FamMed.2022.501410},
abstract = {Background and Objectives: Public health training became particularly important for family medicine (FM) residency training programs amid the COVID-19 pandemic; the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME IV.C.19) requires a structured curriculum in which residents address population health. Our primary goal was to understand if, and to what extent, public health interventions trainings were incorporated into FM residency training programs amid the COVID-19 pandemic. We hypothesized programs with more resources (eg, university affiliates) would be better able to incorporate the training compared to those without such resources (ie, nonuniversity affiliates).
Methods: In 2021, we incorporated items addressing COVID-19 public health training competencies into the 2021 Council of Academic Family Medicine Educational Research Alliance national survey of FM residency program directors. The items addressed the type of training provided, mode of delivery, barriers to providing training, perceived importance of training, and support in delivering training.
Results: The overall survey response rate was 46.4% (n=287/619). All programs offered at least some training to residents. There were no statistically significant differences in training intensity between university and nonuniversity affiliates. The length of time an FM residency director spent in their position was positively associated with training intensity (r=0.1430, P=.0252). The biggest barrier to providing the trainings was the need to devote time to other curriculum requirements.
Conclusions: FM residency programs were able to provide some public health interventions training during the pandemic. With increased support and resources, FM resident training curricula may better prepare FM residents now in anticipation of a future pandemic.},
URL = {https://journals.stfm.org//familymedicine/2022/may/sanders-2021-0466/},
eprint = {https://journals.stfm.org//media/4778/sanders-2021-0466.pdf},
}