@article{10.22454/FamMed.2023.664616,
author = {Hogan, Sean O. and Sangha, Sonia and Mason, Bonnie S.},
title = {Efforts to Recruit Diverse Resident Complements in Family Medicine},
journal = {Family Medicine},
volume = {55},
number = {8},
year = {2023},
month = {9},
pages = {518-524},
doi = {10.22454/FamMed.2023.664616},
abstract = {Background and Objectives: Family medicine is the most demographically diverse specialty in medicine today. Specialty associations and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) urge residency programs to engage in systematic efforts to recruit diverse resident complements. Using responses from program directors to the ACGME’s mandatory annual update, we enumerate the efforts in resident recruiting. This allows us to compare these statements to the recommendations of two highly respected commissions: the Sullivan Commission on Diversity in the Healthcare Workforce and the Institute of Medicine’s In the Nation’s Compelling Interest: Ensuring Diversity of the Healthcare Workforce.
Methods: We compiled the annual updates from 689 family medicine programs and analyzed them using a qualitative method called template analysis. We then classified the efforts and compared them to the recommendations of the Sullivan Commission and Institute of Medicine (IOM).
Results: Nearly all (98%) of the programs completed the portion of the annual update inquiring about recruiting residents. The Sullivan Commission and IOM recommended 23 steps to diversify workforce recruiting. We found that programs engaged in all but one of these recommendations. Among the most frequently employed recommendations were doing holistic reviews and using data for planning. None mentioned engaging in public awareness campaigns. Programs also implemented eight strategies not suggested in either report, with staff training in nondiscrimination policies being among the most frequently mentioned. Among program efforts not included in the Sullivan Commission or IOM recommendations were extracurricular activities; appointing diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) committees or advocates; subinternship (Sub-I) experiences; recruiting at conferences; blind reviews; legal compliance; and merit criteria. In total, we found 31 interventions in use.
Conclusions: The Sullivan Commission’s guidance, IOM recommendations, and program-developed initiatives can be combined to create a comprehensive roster of diversity recruiting initiatives. Programs may use this authoritative resource for identifying their next steps in advancing their recruiting efforts.},
URL = {https://journals.stfm.org//familymedicine/2023/september/hogan-2022-0180/},
eprint = {https://journals.stfm.org//media/6021/hogan0180fixeddocx-2023-08-31-19-20.pdf},
}