@article{10.22454/FamMed.2026.586857,
author = {Vorobej, Lucy and Whitehead, Cynthia},
title = {Yesterday’s Patterns, Tomorrow’s Possibilities: Historical Methods in Family Medicine},
journal = {Family Medicine},
volume = {58},
number = {2},
year = {2026},
month = {2},
pages = {152-159},
doi = {10.22454/FamMed.2026.586857},
abstract = {Historical perspectives remain an underused resource in family medicine research, despite their capacity to explain the development of current challenges and the persistence of certain assumptions in family medicine education. Consequently, many scholars have had little opportunity to engage with historical approaches or the questions they invite. This gap is notable at a time when concern about the family medicine workforce and the effectiveness of educational reform have prompted renewed attention to how the discipline prepares and inspires future practitioners.
This manuscript introduces the potential of historical inquiry within family medicine education research and invites readers to consider how a historical lens can expand the ways researchers frame and investigate problems in the field. Although educational strategies are often presented as novel responses to current pressures, many have deeper roots that become visible only when viewed across longer periods. To demonstrate how historians interpret scholarship, context, and sources to construct an account of change over time, we draw on our examination of the Canadian Family Physician journal from 1967 to 2000. The example is intended to clarify methodological principles rather than to present findings.
By outlining how historical inquiry operates in practice, this paper gives researchers a starting point for bringing historical perspectives into their own studies and for opening lines of inquiry that fall outside the reach of contemporary data.},
URL = {https://journals.stfm.org//familymedicine/2026/february/vorobej-0207/},
eprint = {https://journals.stfm.org//media/qqacbkjv/fammed-58-152.pdf},
}