BRIEF REPORTS

Skills Training for Family Medicine Residents to Attenuate the Impact of Childhood Trauma: A Pilot Study

Becky Bell Scott, PhD | Lance Kelley, PhD | Samantha Schilling, MD, MSHP

Fam Med. 2024;56(3):180-184.

DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2024.245065

Return to Issue

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Toxic stress and trauma are prevalent in the pediatric population. The sequela can be significant, leading to disruptive behaviors in early childhood to chronic medical conditions in adulthood. Two factors that can mitigate negative outcomes of developmental traumatic stress include relational health care and healthy parental relationships. Family physicians are poised to play a significant role in both attenuating factors. Therefore, focused pediatric trauma-informed knowledge and skills training for family medicine residents is important.

Methods: One family medicine residency program added a training module for residents, with two objectives: increase in-exam room trauma-informed interaction skills, and increase knowledge and skills for physicians to coach parents on strengthening the parent-child relationship. The training included didactics and skills training. Knowledge and skills were measured pre- and posttraining.

Results: A total of 39 residents participated in the study over 3 years. The knowledge score increased by 4.49 points from pre- to posttraining. The number of trauma-informed interactional skills the residents demonstrated at posttraining had increased significantly. During the pilot, all participants moved from below mastery of skills to full mastery.

Conclusions: After being instructed in best practices in trauma-informed pediatric interactions, residents demonstrated an increased number of behaviors that cultivate pediatric relational health care. Residents demonstrated knowledge and skills gains that denoted their ability to interact with patients and coach parents in evidence-based ways that can mitigate the impact of childhood trauma exposure.

Introduction

Childhood trauma and toxic stress are present in up to 60% of the population 1, 2 and can contribute to sequala in childhood such as disruptive behaviors.3 Negative early childhood environments also impact health over the life span and are highly correlated with chronic medical conditions in adult years.1, 4-7 Two factors that can mitigate negative outcomes of developmental traumatic stress include relational health care and healthy parental relationships. 4, 5 Both of these variables provide opportunities for family physicians to attenuate the impact of toxic childhood stress.

The toxic stress many young children experience can have a bidirectional impact on parent stress and child disruptive behavior.8-11 Rather than pathologizing the child’s behavior, a trauma-informed care (TIC) approach shifts the focus to equipping the parent with skills to improve their relationship and manage difficult behaviors. Operationalizing TIC in pediatric patient interactions includes some approaches discordant with patient-centered communication models taught in medicine. For example, while physicians are taught that asking open-ended questions is central to patient-centered care 12 in interactions with children, the style and frequency of questions qualitatively impact the exchange.13-15 In TIC, decreasing the frequency of questions while increasing the lead of the child in the relational engagement is preferred. Other operationalized TIC behaviors are listed in Table 1.

We developed and evaluated a training curriculum for first-year family medicine residents that aimed to increase in-exam room interaction skills. The curriculum focused on trust and responsiveness between physician and patient, and physician knowledge and skills to coach parents on strengthening the parent-child relationship

METHODS

Curriculum

The curriculum was based on Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE), an interactional model derived from evidenced-based parent management training models such as Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) and the Positive Parenting Program.16, 17 Although CARE has been adapted into team-based primary care settings to be used with parents, 18, 19 that model was designed primarily to provide professionals with skills to improve child-adult relationships. 18 CARE has been designated by the National Child Stress and Trauma Network as a TIC approach.16 The curriculum used in the resident training described here was based on foster parent 20 and psychiatry residents’ CARE training, 21 with minor adjustments relevant to family medicine, and was highly informed by parent management training literature,22-27 the American Academy of Pediatrics practice guidelines for TIC,4, 5 and the literature on the relationship between developmental trauma and externalized behavior disorders. 14, 28

In this pilot, the curriculum was delivered in one 4-hour session and included didactics, skills training, and coaching. After the skills were taught, residents engaged in role-plays with coaching until skill mastery was achieved. Residents then were prompted to use teach-back to explain the behavioral reinforcement skills of CARE as if they were teaching them briefly to a parent. More than half of the instructional period focused on skill development, with in situ coaching from the instructor, a certified CARE and PCIT trainer. This module was delivered during 3 consecutive years for each resident cohort. CARE skills were reinforced longitudinally, monitored throughout residency, including during a behavioral health rotation with a clinical psychologist, outpatient pediatric rotations with a behavioral health professional trained in CARE, and episodic video monitoring. The patient-centered communication skills from the module were monitored and plotted by the Clinical Competency Committee according to the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education family medicine milestone Interpersonal and Communication Skills 1: Patient and Family-Centered Communication. 

Assessment

Residents completed a multiple-choice knowledge test before and after training. This test has been used to demonstrate a knowledge increase of PCIT principles in a nonparent sample. 29 This measure was used to assess mastery of concepts taught within the module, focusing on the knowledge acquisition of how to increase connection with a child, apply behavior-modification skills, and coach a parent in these skills.29 The assessment included 17 questions, with 1 point awarded for each correct answer for a possible range of 0 to 17.

Pre- and posttraining skills observations were conducted using the coding system for CARE training. This coding system was developed by PCIT trainers, creators of CARE, based on the Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS).30 DPICS has sufficient interrater reliability, 31 strong construct validity, 32 and high responsiveness to behavior change33 and can be adapted effectively to other adult-child skills-training programs. 34, 35 The coder in this study was certified in DPICS. Skills acquisition was quantified by coding interactions in a role-play with an adult portraying a 5-year-old. Residents were prompted to demonstrate a 5-minute interaction in which they would engage with a child to establish trust and increase connection. The instructor observed the physician’s use of pediatric relationship-enhancement interaction skill. The coder noted how often the physician engaged in interactive behaviors that can detract from a TIC interaction.

Analysis

We summarized demographic characteristics and calculated means for pre- and postknowledge tests and each observation code. We also calculated paired one-sample mean-comparison t tests. This study was exempted by the Baylor University Institutional Review Board.

RESULTS

A total of 39 residents participated in the study (Table 2). The pretraining mean score was 9.77 (57% correct) with a range of 5 to 14. The posttraining mean score was 14.26 (84% correct) with a range of 11 to 16. The mean change represented an improvement of 4.49 points (95% CI 3.79, 5.18; P<.001).

Regarding the pre- and posttraining coded observations, the number of relational detraction, or non-TIC behaviors, significantly decreased after the training, and the number of skills that facilitate positive physician-child interaction significantly increased after the training (all P≤.03). All residents moved from below CARE skill mastery to full mastery posttraining (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

The delivery of a half-day module to support TIC in physician practice is feasible, and the demonstration of skills gained reflects the importance of explicitly teaching pediatric interaction skills.36 At baseline, residents demonstrated an appropriate level of avoidance of negative statements (defined as overly corrective phrases, or misapplied use of “don’t”). However, all but one resident exceeded the number of appropriate questions when forming a trust-based relationship with a child. At a rapid-fire pace, 38% of the trainees asked the patient more than six nonexam-related questions per minute. This baseline behavior contradicts the recommendations of trauma-informed practice.14, 16, 18 Residents remarked that modifying this behavior was challenging for them because they often had applied the concept of asking questions as a way of gaining relationship.

This pilot evaluation had several limitations. Assessments were completed immediately following the training, demonstrating immediate skill and knowledge gains. Future work should assess long-term gains by applying the same coding system longitudinally rather than aggregating these skills into residents’ comprehensive patient-centered communication skills. Because no existing validated instruments to evaluate the knowledge and skills targeted were available, another important limitation was that we adapted a knowledge assessment29 and coding system from PCIT training. 30 Future psychometric investigation of the measures would be helpful in supporting our conclusions. In this pilot study, a single coder was used, who was not blinded to whether the assessment was pre- or posttraining. To reduce observer bias, future evaluations should include multiple coders who are blinded to training status.

CONCLUSIONS

Residents demonstrated statistically significant knowledge and skill gains after the training, suggesting that their assumed baseline pediatric interaction skills and capacity to coach parents in behavior modification techniques improved. Training in these skills operationalizes several Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education recommendations37, 38 and American Academy of Pediatrics practice guidelines and has the potential to contribute to relational pediatric care.3,5, 36, 38, 39, 40, 41

Presentations

A Stepped-Care Approach Treating Pediatric Behavior Disorders and Symptoms Is Sustainable Within a Primary Care Setting. Presented at the Collaborative Family Healthcare Association Annual Conference, October 14, 2022.

References

  1. Marsac ML, Kassam-Adams N, Hildenbrand AK, et al. Implementing a trauma-informed approach in pediatric health care networks. JAMA Pediatr. 2016;170(1):70-77. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2015.2206
  2. McLaughlin KA, Koenen KC, Hill ED, et al. Trauma exposure and posttraumatic stress disorder in a national sample of adolescents. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2013;52(8):815-830.e14. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2013.05.011
  3. Sara G, Lappin J. Childhood trauma: psychiatry’s greatest public health challenge? Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(7):e300-e301. doi:10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30104-4
  4. Duffee J, Szilagyi M, Forkey H, Kelly ET; Council on Community Pediatrics; Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care; Council on Child Abuse and Neglect; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Trauma-informed care in child health systems. Pediatrics. 2021;148(2):e2021052579. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-052579
  5. Forkey H, Szilagyi M, Kelly ET, Duffee J; Council on Foster Care, Adoption, and Kinship Care; Council on Community Pediatrics; Council on Child Abuse and Neglect; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health. Trauma-informed care. Pediatrics. 2021;148(2):e2021052580. doi:10.1542/peds.2021-052580
  6. Shonkoff JP, Garner AS, Siegel BS; Committee on Psychosocial Aspects of Child and Family Health; Committee on Early Childhood, Adoption, and Dependent Care; Section on Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics. The lifelong effects of early childhood adversity and toxic stress. Pediatrics. 2012;129(1):e232-e246. doi:10.1542/peds.2011-2663
  7. Merrick MT, Ford DC, Ports KA, et al. Vital signs: estimated proportion of adult health problems attributable to adverse childhood experiences and implications for prevention—25 States, 2015-2017. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2019;68(44):999-1,005. doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm6844e1
  8. Meadows T, Valleley R, Haack MK, Thorson R, Evans J. Physician “costs” in providing behavioral health in primary care. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011;50(5):447-455. doi:10.1177/0009922810390676
  9. Wood JN, Kratchman D, Scribano PV, Berkowitz S, Schilling S. Improving child behaviors and parental stress: a randomized trial of child adult relationship enhancement in primary care. Acad Pediatr. 2021;21(4):629-637. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2020.08.002
  10. Kochanova K, Pittman LD, Pabis JM. Parenting stress, parenting, and adolescent externalizing problems. J Child Fam Stud. 2021;30(9):2,141-2,154. doi:10.1007/s10826-021-01996-2
  11. Camisasca E, Miragoli S, Di Blasio P, Feinberg M. Pathways among negative co-parenting, parenting stress, authoritarian parenting style, and child adjustment: the emotional dysregulation driven model. J Child Fam Stud. 2022;31(11):3,085-3,096. doi:10.1007/s10826-022-02408-9
  12. Kurtz SM, Silverman JD, Draper J. Teaching and Learning Communication Skills in Medicine. Radcliffe Medical Press; 2005.
  13. Clemente I, Heritage J, Meldrum ML, Tsao JC, Zeltzer LK. Preserving the child as a respondent: initiating patient-centered interviews in a US outpatient tertiary care pediatric pain clinic. Commun Med. 2012;9(3):203-213. doi:10.1558/cam.v9i3.203
  14. Gurwitch RH, Messer EP, Funderburk BW. Parent-child interaction therapy. In: Landolt MA, Cloitre, M, Schnyder U, eds. Evidence-Based Treatments for Trauma Related Disorders in Children and Adolescents. Springer International Publishing; 2017:341-361. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46138-0_16
  15. Forkey H, Inkelas M, Ocampo A, et al. Pediatric approach to trauma treatment and resilience—a novel relationship-based curriculum and approach to train pediatric professionals to provide trauma-informed care. Acad Pediatr. 2022;22(2):342-345. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2021.07.023
  16. Gurwitch RH, Messer EP, Masse J, Olafson E, Boat BW, Putnam FW. Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE): an evidence-informed program for children with a history of trauma and other behavioral challenges. Child Abuse Negl. 2016;53:138-145. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.10.016
  17. Ward MA, Theule J, Cheung K. Parent–child interaction therapy for child disruptive behaviour disorders: a meta-analysis. Child Youth Care Forum. 2016;45(5):675-690. doi:10.1007/s10566-016-9350-5
  18. Scott B, Gurwitch RH, Messer EP, Kelley LP, Myers DR, Young JK. Integrated CARE: adaptation of Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE) model for use in integrated behavioral pediatric care. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2021;60(2):100-108. doi:10.1177/0009922820959938
  19. Schilling S, French B, Berkowitz SJ, Dougherty SL, Scribano PV, Wood JN. Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement in Primary Care (PriCARE): a randomized trial of a parent training for child behavior problems. Acad Pediatr. 2017;17(1):53-60. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2016.06.009
  20. Wood JN, Dougherty SL, Long J, Messer EP, Rubin D. A pilot investigation of a novel intervention to improve behavioral well-being for children in foster care. J Emot Behav Disord. 2017;27(1):3-13. doi:10.1177/1063426617733715
  21. Murphy KG, Warner-Metzger CM, Moreland AD. Child-Adult Relationship Enhancement (CARE): expanding evidence-based child behavior management skills to an academic medical center. Behav Therapist. 2019;42(4):118-121.
  22. Gomez D, Bridges AJ, Andrews AR III, et al. Delivering parent management training in an integrated primary care setting: description and preliminary outcome data. Cogn Behav Pract. 2014;21(3):296-309. doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2014.04.003
  23. Danko CM, Garbacz LL, Budd KS. Outcomes of parent–child interaction therapy in an urban community clinic: a comparison of treatment completers and dropouts. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016;60:42-51. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.007
  24. Webster-Stratton C. The incredible years: use of play interventions and coaching for children with externalizing difficulties. In: Reddy LA, Files-Hall, TM, Schaefer, CE, eds. Empirically Based Play Interventions for Children. 2nd ed. American Psychological Association; 2016:137-158, doi:10.1037/14730-008
  25. Eyberg S, Pincus D. Eyberg Child Behavior Inventory & Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory–Revised. Psychological Assessment Resources; 1999.
  26. Mash EJ, Barkley RA. Treatment of Childhood Disorders. 3rd ed. Guilford Press; 2006.
  27. Baumann AA, Powell BJ, Kohl PL, et al. Cultural adaptation and implementation of evidence-based parent-training: a systematic review and critique of guiding evidence. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2015;53:113-120. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.03.025
  28. Thomas R, Abell B, Webb HJ, Avdagic E, Zimmer-Gembeck MJ. Parent-child interaction therapy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3):e20170352. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-0352
  29. Lee EL, Wilsie CC, Brestan-Knight E. Using parent–child interaction therapy to develop a pre-parent education module. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2011;33(7):1,254-1,261. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.02.024
  30. Eyberg SM, Nelson MM, Ginn NC, Bhuiyan N, Boggs SR. Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS): Comprehensive Manual for Research and Training. 4th ed. PCIT International Inc; 2013.
  31. Cañas, M, Ibabe, I, De Paúl, J. Promising observational instruments of parent-child (0–12 years) interaction within the child protection system: a systematic review. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2020;109:104713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104713
  32. Cañas M, Ibabe I, Arruabarrena I, De Paúl J. Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System (DPICS): factorial structure and concurrent validity. Psicothema. 2021;33(2):328-336. doi:10.7334/psicothema2020.429
  33. Kohlhoff J, Morgan S, Briggs N, Egan R, Niec L. Parent–child interaction therapy with toddlers: a community-based randomized controlled trial with children aged 14–24 months. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2021;50(3):1-16. doi:10.1080/15374416.2020.1723599
  34. Eyberg SM. Manual for the Dyadic Parent-Child Interaction Coding System. 3rd ed. University of Florida; 2010
  35. Hurlburt MS, Nguyen K, Reid J, Webster-Stratton C, Zhang J. Efficacy of the incredible years group parent program with families in Head Start who self-reported a history of child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 2013;37(8):531-543. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2012.10.008
  36. Sokolovic N, Rodrigues M, Tricco AC, Dobrina R, Jenkins JM. Teaching parents to be responsive: a network meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2021;148(2):e2020033563. doi:10.1542/peds.2020-033563
  37. Adam P, Murphy CF, Dierich M, Hager KD. Seven years of teaching communication with the patient-centered observation form. Fam Med. 2018;50(2):132-137. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2018.516713
  38. Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, Epstein RM. How does communication heal? pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74(3):295-301. doi:10.1016/j.pec.2008.11.015
  39. Jansen KL, Rosenbaum ME. The state of communication education in family medicine residencies. Fam Med. 2016;48(6):445-451.  
  40. Brown JD, King MA, Wissow LS. The central role of relationships with trauma-informed care for children and youth. Systems of Care and Clinical Practice. 2016;10(7S):94-101.

Lead Author

Becky Bell Scott, PhD

Affiliations: Garland School of Social Work, Baylor University, Waco, TX

Co-Authors

Lance Kelley, PhD - Waco Family Medicine, Waco, TX

Samantha Schilling, MD, MSHP - Department of Pediatrics, Division of General Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

Corresponding Author

Becky Bell Scott, PhD

Correspondence: Garland School of Social Work, Baylor University, Waco, TX

Email: becky_scott@baylor.edu

Fetching other articles...

Loading the comment form...

Submitting your comment...

There are no comments for this article.

Downloads & Info

Share

Related Content