LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

In Response to “Matching 25% of Medical Students Into Family Medicine by 2030: Realistic or Beyond Our Reach?”

Kimberly Kardonsky, MD | Amanda Kost, MD, MEd | David V. Evans, MD

Fam Med. 2021;53(10):902-902.

DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2021.721513

Return to Issue

To the Editor:

We were pleased to see the recent article “Matching 25% of Medical Students into Family Medicine by 2030: Realistic or Beyond Our Reach?”1 We think this goal is realistic. If we want to make the 25 by 2030 a reality, it is important for medical schools to examine their application and acceptance processes.

The University of Washington School of Medicine (UWSOM) Targeted Rural and Underserved Track (TRUST) program has a separate admissions process from the rest of UWSOM. TRUST graduates match into family medicine (FM) at a rate of 25%.2 We further found that students who applied to and participated in the program, as well as students who applied to and were not accepted into the program all matched in FM at the same rate. Implementing a selection process for students who have rural ties, have a stated interest in FM,3 and who state they do not have an interest in specialty or academic medicine could go a long way to meeting the 25 x 2030 goal.

We acknowledge the challenges identified by Dr David et al. Health care coverage, physician payment, and the overall health system is often misaligned with the core values of FM. We can, however, admit applicants with strong stated interest in FM and rural ties and support their interests during medical school with creative curricula and top-notch faculty and staff to achieve the 25 x 2030 goal. The health care system needs improvement, but so do medical school admissions processes. Medical schools can take action today to meet the health care needs of the public.

References

  1. David AK. Matching 25% of medical students in family medicine by 2030: realistic or beyond our reach? Fam Med. 2021;53(4):252-255. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.982403
  2. Kardonsky K, Evans DV, Erickson J, Kost A. Impact of a targeted rural and underserved track on medical student match into family medicine and other needed workforce specialties. Fam Med. 2021;53(2):111-117. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.351484
  3. Kost A, Cantone RE, Schneider B, Sairenji T, Palmer R. Validation and comparison of a brief instrument vs a single-item screen to predict entry to family medicine at matriculation to Medical school. Fam Med. 2018;50(9):672-678. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2018.258795

Lead Author

Kimberly Kardonsky, MD

Affiliations: Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Co-Authors

Amanda Kost, MD, MEd - Department of Family Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA

David V. Evans, MD - University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Fetching other articles...

Loading the comment form...

Submitting your comment...

By Gordon Wilhoit, MD  /  Posted 11/14/2021

More than 40 years ago I attended a medical school dedicated to producing well trained Primary Care Docs for the community and beyond. The 1st few classes were indeed around 50% Primary Care but after word of long hours with little backup due to practicing in extremely rural areas with very low reimbursement compared to our specialist brethren that percentage fell precipitously. My son's med school class of 287 new docs had 4 choose Family Practice and 14 choose Dermatology, 7 anesthesiology, and 14 choose orthopedics. You don't need to design the admission process to alter this pattern, instead work on improving reimbursement for Primary Care Docs. Value Based Care which started with the ACA with its service codes reimbursed mostly just to Primary Care Docs was a good start but even today < 40% of PCPs utilize these codes despite delivering the service. Until awareness of and billing of these codes becomes commonplace and PCP reimbursement approaches that of specialties, the current pattern of placement will prevail. Many prospective students may profess their desire to go into Primary Care only to have an epiphany after getting into school.

By John Culberson  /  Posted 11/14/2021

Admitting medical students and training Family Physicians are two separate variables. Support for residency training and academic faculty requires specific attention.

Downloads & Info

Share

Related Content

David AK. Matching 25% of Medical Students in Family Medicine by 2030: Realistic or Beyond Our Reach? Fam Med. 2021;53(4):252-255. https://doi.org/10.22454/FamMed.2021.982403.

Tags

Searching for articles...