BRIEF REPORTS

COVID-19: A Qualitative Analysis of Academic Family Physician Leaders’ Crisis Response

David G. White, MD, CCFP, FCFP | Mary Ann O'Brien, PhD | Sylvie D. Cornacchi, MSc | Risa Freeman, MD, MEd, CCFP, FCFP | Eva Grunfeld, MD, DPhil, CCFP, FCFP

Fam Med. 2023;55(1):38-44.

DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.55.421082

Return to Issue

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic severely threatened all aspects of academic family medicine, constituting a crisis. Multiple publications have identified recommendations and documented the creative responses of primary care and academic organizations to address these challenges, but there is little research on how decisions came about. Our objective was to gain insight into the context, process, and nature of family medicine leaders’ discussions in pivoting to address a crisis.

Methods: We used a qualitative descriptive design to explore new dimensions of existing concepts. The setting was the academic family medicine department at the University of Toronto. To identify leadership themes, we used the constant comparative method to analyze transcripts of monthly meetings of the departmental executive: three meetings immediately before and three following the declaration of a state emergency in Ontario.

Results: Six themes were evident before and after the onset of the pandemic: building capacity in academic family medicine; developing leadership; advancing equity, diversity, and inclusion; learner safety and wellness; striving for excellence; and promoting a supportive and collegial environment. Five themes emerged as specific responses to the crisis: situational awareness; increased multidirectional communication; emotional awareness; innovation in education and patient care; and proactive planning for extended adaptation to the pandemic.

Conclusion: Existing cultural and organizational approaches formed the foundation for the crisis response, while crisis-specific themes reflected skills and attitudes that are essential in clinical family medicine, including adapting to community needs, communication, and emotional awareness.

Introduction

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic threatened all aspects of academic family medicine (FM),1 constituting a crisis.2 It prompted multiple research articles on leadership,13 FM management,4,-9 academic pivots,10,-12 and lessons learned,13-19 but few have examined how these responses arose.20 Our objective was to gain insight into the context and nature of FM leaders’ discussions to address a crisis.

Methods

Design

We used a qualitative descriptive design, which is appropriate to understand a phenomenon within its context.21

Setting

The Department of Family and Community Medicine (DFCM) at the University of Toronto uses a distributed academic model,22 with over 1,900 faculty at 14 hospital sites and multiple community practices. Monthly executive meetings include the chair, academic programs leaders, hospital site chiefs and senior staff. Meetings are forums for exchanging information, formulating policy, and coordinating action.

Data Collection

From a sampling frame of recordings of monthly executive meetings, we purposively sampled23 six: three meetings before Ontario declared a state emergency in March 2020 and three afterward (Figure 1). All attendees (median 33, range 30-36) consented and the University of Toronto provided ethics approval.

Data Analysis

The coding guide was informed by three dominant attributes of effective leadership: a vision, enabling others to succeed, and excellence in an area. 24 We identified additional attributes from crisis leadership literature. 25-33

We used the constant comparative method.34-36 Two researchers who were not members of the executive committee and did not attend meetings independently coded transcripts. They assigned codes to leadership behaviors and compared codes within and across transcripts. Major themes with supporting quotes were then developed and discussed with the team. To reduce the potential for errors in data interpretation, three research team members who were on the executive committee checked the deidentified quotes against the themes.37 We maintained study rigor through a systematic record of codes and memos, using data management software and research team expertise.37-39 We addressed member checking through a presentation and discussion of our findings with the executive in December 2021.37

Results

Figure 2 presents an overview of the themes and timeline. 

Six Themes Present in All Meetings (Appendix Table A)

See Appendix Table A for descriptions with exemplar supporting quotes, of the following six major themes.

Building capacity and expertise in academic FM was a focus of all meetings. After pandemic onset, everyone demonstrated eagerness to help through expanded clinical roles and broader responsibilities in response to community needs, despite uncertainty. Table 2 lists examples.

Building leadership capacity in FM was evident in many examples of nurturing and supporting leaders and identifying rising stars. During the crisis, we noted the emergence of new leaders among front-line staff.

Commitment to advancing equity, diversity,and inclusion (EDI) was evident in all meetings. An equity lead was appointed in January 2020 and an EDI retreat was planned. During the pandemic, we noted advocacy for vulnerable populations.

The executive consistently took responsibility for learner safety and well-being. During the crisis, concerns centered on emotional well-being, physical safety, and supporting attainment of competency.

All meetings had examples of striving for and celebrating excellence, including encouragement to apply for awards, grants, and promotion, and a standing agenda item recognizing recipients. As the crisis unfolded, recognition focussed on successes in improving virtual care and education.

A supportive and collegial environment was evident in frequently expressed appreciation for the ideas, contributions and expertise of faculty, residents, and learners, and included respectful voicing of disagreement or concerns.

Five Crisis-Specific Themes (Table 1)

Situational awareness was a key executive function, through gathering and interpreting pertinent crisis information. Leaders grappled with decision-making in the face of uncertainty and rapid adaptation to changing clinical and educational protocols.

Increasing multidimensional communication beyond existing networks was essential. A web page was published with current information and links. Frequent email and Zoom check-ins kept everyone updated. A “Chief’s COVID-19 Roundtable” facilitated joint problem-solving. Improving communication with isolated community family physicians was highlighted.

The executive demonstrated emotional awareness of the pandemic’s impact, with opportunities to vocalize fears and address concerns. Staying calm and reassuring staff and learners were priorities. Wellness and resilience initiatives were shared. There were expressions of positivity, optimism, and gratitude, despite challenges.

Innovations in education and patient care included rapid pivots to virtual care and education (Table 2). Alternative locations and protocols were launched for in-person care and COVID-19 assessments, mitigating the impact of the closure of some community FP offices.24 A province-wide webinar program was launched to provide resources and support for FPs.

Proactive planning for extended adaptation began shortly after the onset of the pandemic, such as anticipating the needs of incoming learners. Executive members expressed commitment to maintaining core functions.

Discussion

This research adds to the literature by systematically identifying the context, nature, and culture underpinning actions academic family physicians undertook in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. The specific clinical and academic initiatives are similar to those previously reported. 1, 4-12

The six ongoing themes formed the foundation for the crisis response. The collegial environment fostered trust, considered essential for crisis management.40-45 Crises are unexpected, unstructured, characterized by incomplete and conflicting information, and outside typical operational frameworks.3, 25, 46 * The need for new approaches was evident in the emergence of five crisis-specific themes. Situational awareness is essential for developing strategies and making decisions during uncertainty.25, 28, 29 Along with increased multidirectional communication, this sustains trust in a chaotic and rapidly changing environment.

The ongoing themes of building capacity and expertise, striving for excellence, and developing leadership created an expectation to confront the crisis with authenticity, competence, and credibility.13, 25, 41, 44 Enhanced support for the well-being of the health care workforce, including trainees, is an important learning.16

The pandemic has highlighted the importance of quality primary care for population health47, 48 and the value of generalism for rapid adaptation to addressing emerging needs.49 This research suggests that the skills and culture of FM facilitate an effective crisis response.

A strength of analyzing meeting transcripts is avoiding recall bias by accessing discussions as they occurred, but a limitation is omission of nonverbal interactions. The six selected meetings underrepresent communications and discussions throughout the DFCM and focussed only on the initial onset of a pandemic that continues to generate crises and controversies. We assessed that our analysis achieved informational saturation, but we are cautious due to the limited data set.50 This study is exploratory; a richer grounded-theory approach capturing more executive meetings and discussions throughout DFCM’s 14 sites could provide greater insight into the response and its perceived effectiveness.

Conclusion

This exploratory study identifies six themes describing the cultural and organizational approaches that formed the foundation for the pandemic crisis response of academic FM leaders. Five crisis-specific themes reflect skills and attitudes that are essential in clinical family medicine, including adapting to community needs, communication, and emotional awareness.

Footnote

* These descriptors usefully distinguish the COVID pandemic crisis from medical emergencies, for which there are recognized management protocols.

Acknowledgments

Presentations: This study was presented as an oral presentation entitled “Responding to COVID-19: A qualitative analysis of academic family physician leaders’ responses to an evolving crisis” at a virtual conference, November 20-23, 2021.

Conflict Disclosure: David White and Risa Freeman are members of the Executive of the Department of Family & Community Medicine, University of Toronto. Eva Grunfeld is a past member.

References

1. Kim CS, Lynch JB, Cohen S, et al. One academic health system’s early (and ongoing) experience responding to COVID-19: recommendations from the initial epicenter of the pandemic in the United States. Acad Med. 2020;95(8):1146-1148. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003410

2. Rosenthal U, Charles MT, Hart P. Coping with crises: the management of disasters, riots, and terrorism. Charles C Thomas Pub Limited; 1989.

3. Paixão G, Mills C, McKimm J, Hassanien MA, Al-Hayani AA. Leadership in a crisis: doing things differently, doing different things. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2020;81(11):1-9. doi:10.12968/hmed.2020.0611

4. Sorsby S, Schmit E, Ventres W. Workplace communication in the midst of COVID-19: making sense of uncertainty, preparing for the future. Fam Med. 2021;53(2):159-160. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.216908

5. Wu V, Shorr RI. Helping patients flourish in the midst of COVID-19. Fam Med. 2021;53(5):328-330. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.376920

6. Gold KJ, Laurie AR, Kinney DR, Harmes KM, Serlin DC. Video visits: family physician experiences with uptake during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fam Med. 2021;53(3):207-210. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.613099

7. Ledford CJW, Anderson LN. Communication strategies for family physicians practicing throughout emerging public health crises. Fam Med. 2020;52(5):48-50. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2020.960734

8. Krist AH, DeVoe JE, Cheng A, Ehrlich T, Jones SM. Redesigning primary care to address the COVID-19 pandemic in the midst of the pandemic. Ann Fam Med. 2020;18(4):349-354. doi:10.1370/afm.2557

9. Glazier RH, Green ME, Wu FC, Frymire E, Kopp A, Kiran T. Shifts in office and virtual primary care during the early COVID-19 pandemic in Ontario, Canada. CMAJ. 2021;193(6):E200-E210. doi:10.1503/cmaj.202303

10. Everard KM, Schiel KZ. Changes in family medicine clerkship teaching due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Fam Med. 2021;53(4):282-284. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.583240

11. Pasala MS, Anabtawi NM, Farris RL, et al. Family medicine residency virtual adaptations for applicants during COVID-19. Fam Med. 2021;53(8):684-688. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.735717

12. Gigliotti RA. The impact of COVID-19 on academic department chairs: heightened complexity, accentuated liminality, and competing perceptions of reinvention. Innovative High Educ. 2021;46(4):429-444. doi:10.1007/s10755-021-09545-x

13. Ion R, Craswell A, Hughes L, et al. International nurse education leaders’ experiences of responding to the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study. J Adv Nurs. 2021;77(9):3797-3805. doi:10.1111/jan.14892

14. Rotenstein LS, Huckman RS, Cassel CK. Making doctors effective managers and leaders: a matter of health and well-being. Acad Med. 2021;96(5):652-654. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003887

15. Dirani KM, Abadi M, Alizadeh A, et al. Leadership competencies and the essential role of human resource development in times of crisis: a response to Covid-19 pandemic. Hum Resour Dev Int. 2020;23(4):380-394. doi:10.1080/13678868.2020.1780078

16. Aagaard EM, Earnest M. Educational leadership in the time of a pandemic: lessons from two institutions. FASEB Bioadv. 2020;3(3):182-188. doi:10.1096/fba.2020-00113

17. Dumulescu D, Muţiu AI. Academic leadership in the time of COVID-19-experiences and perspectives. Front Psychol. 2021;12:648344. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.648344

18. Sklar DP. COVID-19: lessons from the disaster that can improve health professions education. Acad Med. 2020;95(11):1631-1633. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003547

19. Woolliscroft JO. Innovation in response to the COVID-19 pandemic crisis. Acad Med. 2020;95(8):1140-1142. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000003402

20. Laur CV, Agarwal P, Mukerji G, et al. Building health services in a rapidly changing landscape: lessons in adaptive leadership and pivots in a COVID-19 remote monitoring program. J Med Internet Res. 2021;23(1):e25507. doi:10.2196/25507

21. Sandelowski M. Whatever happened to qualitative description? Res Nurs Health. 2000;23(4):334-340. doi:10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

22. Ellaway R, Bates J. Distributed medical education in Canada. Can Med Educ J. 2018;9(1):e1-e5. doi:10.36834/cmej.43348

23. Patton MQ. Designing qualitative studies. Sage Publications; 2002.

24. Oandasan I, White D, Hammond Mobilio M, et al. Exploring and understanding academic leadership in family medicine. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59(3):e162-e167.

25. Alknawy B. Leadership in times of crisis. BMJ Leader. 2019;3(1):1-5. doi:10.1136/leader-2018-000100

26. Koehn N. Leadership forged in crisis. Leader Leader. 2019;91(91):26-31. doi:10.1002/ltl.20407

27. Deitchman S. Enhancing crisis leadership in public health emergencies. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2013;7(5):534-540. doi:10.1017/dmp.2013.81

28. Gigliotti RA.  Crisis preparedness and the coronavirus pandemic: early reactions from University staff. Fresno State University; 2020. Accessed December 7, 2022. http://fresnostate.edu/adminserv/documents/Crisis%20Preparedness%20and%20the%20Coronavirus%20Pandemic_NCCI_Final.pdf

29. Kaul V, Shah VH, El-Serag H. Leadership during crisis: lessons and applications from the COVID-19 pandemic. Gastroenterology. 2020;159(3):809-812. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.076

30. Boin A, Kuipers S, Overdijk W. Leadership in times of crisis: a framework for assessment. Int Rev Public Adm. 2013;18(1):79-91. doi:10.1080/12294659.2013.10805241

31. Veenema TG, Deruggiero K, Losinski S, Barnett D. Hospital administration and nursing leadership in disasters: an exploratory study using concept mapping. Nurs Adm Q. 2017;41(2):151-163. doi:10.1097/NAQ.0000000000000224

32. White D. Preparing for COVID-19: the lessons from SARS 2003 in Canada. Asia Pac Fam Med. 2019;18(1). doi:10.22146/apfm.v18i1.216

33. Mahoney MC. Radiology leadership in a time of crisis: a chair’s perspective. Acad Radiol. 2020;27(9):1214-1216. doi:10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.042

34. Glaser B, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine; 1967.

35. Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative data. Qual Quant. 2002;36(4):391-409. doi:10.1023/A:1020909529486

36. Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Sage. 2006.

37. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research in health care. Assessing quality in qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320(7226):50-52. doi:10.1136/bmj.320.7226.50

38. Malterud K. Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines. Lancet. 2001;358(9280):483-488. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05627-6

39. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth Generation Evaluation. Sage Publications; 1989.

40. Reynolds B, Quinn Crouse S. Effective communication during an influenza pandemic: the value of using a crisis and emergency risk communication framework. Health Promot Pract. 2008;9(4)(suppl):13S-17S. doi:10.1177/1524839908325267

41. Reynolds B, Deitch S, Schieber RA. Crisis and emergency risk communication: pandemic influenza. CDC Stacks; 2007. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/7037

42. Hershkovich O, Gilad D, Zimlichman E, Kreiss Y. Effective medical leadership in times of emergency: a perspective. Disaster Mil Med. 2016;2(1):4. doi:10.1186/s40696-016-0013-8

43. Nathanial P, Van Der Heyden L. 2020. Framework and principles with applications to CoVid-19: INSEAD working Paper No. 2020/17/FIN/TOM. SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3560259 doi:10.2139/ssrn.3560259

44. Mcnulty EJ, Marcus LJ, Henderson JM. Every leader a crisis leader? Prepare to lead when it matters most. Leader Leader. 2019;2019(94):33-38. doi:10.1002/ltl.20470

45. Mainous AG III. A towering babel of risk information in the COVID-19 pandemic: trust and credibility in risk perception and positive public health behaviors. Fam Med. 2020;52(5):317-319. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2020.530121

46. Al-Dahash H, Thayaparan M, Kulatunga U. 2016. Understanding the terminologies: disaster, crisis and emergency. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference 1191–12000.

47. Robinson SK, Meisnere M, Phillips RL, Mccauley L; Board on Health Care Services. Committee on Implementing High-Quality Primary Care. 2021. Implementing High-Quality Primary Care: Rebuilding the Foundation of Health Care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press

48. Geyman JP. Beyond the COVID-19 pandemic: the urgent need to expand primary care and family medicine. Fam Med. 2021;53(1):48-53. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2021.709555

49. Seehusen DA, Ledford CJW. A clarion call to our family medicine colleagues. Fam Med. 2020;52(7):471-473. doi:10.22454/FamMed.2020.806737

50. Bowen G. Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept. Qual Res. 2008;8(1):137-152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301

Lead Author

David G. White, MD, CCFP, FCFP

Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | North York General Hospital, North York, ON, Canada

Co-Authors

Mary Ann O'Brien, PhD - Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Sylvie D. Cornacchi, MSc - Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Risa Freeman, MD, MEd, CCFP, FCFP - Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | North York General Hospital, North York, ON, Canada

Eva Grunfeld, MD, DPhil, CCFP, FCFP - Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada | Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON, Canada

Corresponding Author

David G. White, MD, CCFP, FCFP

Email: david.white@utoronto.ca

Fetching other articles...

Loading the comment form...

Submitting your comment...

There are no comments for this article.

Downloads & Info

Share

Related Content