— BRIEF REPORTS —

Breastfeeding During Family Medicine Residency

Lina Al-Imari, MD | Susan Hum, MSc | Paul Krueger, PhD, MHSc | Sheila Dunn, MD, MSc

Fam Med. 2019;51(7):587-592.

DOI: 10.22454/FamMed.2019.759632

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Canadian residents’ breastfeeding experiences have only been reported in studies that broadly explored pregnancy and parenthood. We sought to fully explore Canadian family medicine resident mothers’ breastfeeding experiences, and identify strategies to support workplace breastfeeding for future trainees.

Methods: Using an online survey, University of Toronto family medicine residents who gave birth from 2010 through 2016 were queried about their exclusive and overall breastfeeding duration, barriers, and facilitators to workplace breastfeeding, and strategies to improve the breastfeeding experience for future resident mothers. Data were downloaded from Qualtrics software and descriptive statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics v.24.0. Subjective comments were examined and linked to quantitative findings.

Results: Fifty-six of 179 eligible residents completed the survey (31% response rate). More than three-quarters of residents were on maternity leave for 7 to 12 months. All initiated breastfeeding, and 54% breastfed exclusively for 6 months. The median breastfeeding duration was 10 to 12 months. Almost two-thirds of residents were breastfeeding upon return to work, and all experienced barriers to workplace breastfeeding including lack of time, private space, and refrigeration for expressed milk. Lack of a workplace breastfeeding policy and inadequate support from supervisors or program directors were additional barriers. Peer mentorship and more breastfeeding education were identified as strategies to support future residents’ breastfeeding goals.

Conclusions: Addressing long-standing barriers to workplace breastfeeding, and providing peer and educational supports were identified as strategies that could inform program policies to support future trainees’ breastfeeding goals and experiences.


The World Health Organization recommends exclusive breastfeeding for the first 6 months of life, and continued breastfeeding with solids for 2 years and beyond.1 Most physician mothers initiate breastfeeding, yet many wean early due to work-related factors.2-13 Canadian residents’ breastfeeding experiences were gathered from studies that broadly explored pregnancy and motherhood.3, 10-12 A qualitative family medicine study conducted between 1994 and 1999, when maternity leave duration was 6 months,10 and two recent studies of general surgery residents (who took 6 to 12 months maternity leave) showed that barriers to workplace breastfeeding have changed little over this time.11-12

Breastfeeding during residency is an important issue, as increasing numbers of women have pregnancies during training, and many medical students consider work-life balance when choosing residency.14-16 We sought to comprehensively examine Canadian family medicine residents’ breastfeeding experiences and determine supportive workplace breastfeeding strategies.

Methods

This descriptive, cross-sectional, anonymous, online pilot study surveyed residents’ exclusive and overall breastfeeding duration, barriers, and facilitators to workplace breastfeeding, as well as strategies to enhance trainees’ breastfeeding experiences. Some questions allowed additional comments, and final comments were welcomed (see Appendix A at https://journals.stfm.org/media/2430/appendixa-al-imari.pdf). Questions were adapted from earlier studies,2,4-9 and pilot tested by two medical students and a trainee who gave birth during residency and was not a study participant. Eligible participants included 179 female family medicine residents from the University of Toronto who gave birth from 2010 through 2016 and returned to residency after maternity leave. A modified Dillman approach was used to implement the survey17 using Qualtrics software, between February and March 2017. The survey link was emailed to residents by the Postgraduate Family Medicine Education Office, with four generic reminder emails occurring at 2-week intervals, and no incentives were offered. Data were downloaded as an SPSS file, and descriptive statistical analyses were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics v.24.0. Thirty final comments and 12 others that clarified reasons for stopping breastfeeding (question #13), were reviewed and linked by themes to quantitative findings by two investigators independently, and then collectively for consensus. The University of Toronto Research Ethics Board approved the study (Protocol ID 33843).

Results

Fifty-six residents completed the survey (31% response rate). All were married, and most were aged 25 to 34 years, and had one child during the 2-year residency program (Table 1).

Most residents went on maternity leave for 7 to 12 months. All initiated breastfeeding; almost half breastfed exclusively for 6 months, and 40% breastfed over 1 year. About half of the residents met or exceeded their breastfeeding duration goal (Table 2).

Babies were generally 9 months old when their mothers returned to work. Almost two-thirds of residents continued breastfeeding after their maternity leave for another 4-7 months or more. All the babies’ feeding schedules were modified to accommodate work. Pumping at work (63%), modifying work schedules (31%), breastfeeding at home (20%) or at work (14%) during breaks, were rated as fairly to very important strategies to maintain milk supply.

However, residents all faced barriers to workplace breastfeeding. The main challenge was insufficient time to breastfeed/pump due to inflexible schedules (76%), followed by inadequate space (ie, private room) to breastfeed/pump (62%), no refrigeration for expressed milk (61%), no workplace breastfeeding policy (50%), and unsupportive supervisors (40%) or program directors (24%). Although three-quarters of residents felt supported, maintaining breastfeeding was difficult. Our residents’ comments provided some insight into their breastfeeding experiences (Table 3).

Proper physical space to breastfeed/pump, flexible work schedules, and formal workplace policies were rated as highly important strategies to support trainees. Other suggestions included peer mentorship, and more breastfeeding education (Table 3).

Discussion

In this first study to exclusively explore Canadian family medicine residents’ breastfeeding experiences, rates of breastfeeding initiation (97%-100%), and 6-month exclusive breastfeeding (54%) were similar to those reported in earlier Canadian studies.3,10-12 Conversely, American residents’ and physicians’ initiation (mean 84%), and 6-month exclusive breastfeeding rates (mean 27%), and duration (5-9 months) were much lower.2,4-9 The contrast in breastfeeding experiences between Canadians and Americans reflects the significant difference in maternity and parental leave benefits between the two countries. The Family and Medical Leave Act provides up to 12 weeks of unpaid (sick and vacation) leave, while Canada’s standard benefit includes up to 52 weeks of paid maternity and parental leave (55% of average weekly insurable earnings).18,19 It is well established that longer maternity leave is associated with longer breastfeeding duration.20-27

Nonetheless, many North American residents and practicing physicians still face the same barriers to workplace breastfeeding as first reported 25 years ago—namely, inadequate physical space and time to breastfeed/pump due to inflexible work schedules.2-13,28 Currently, there are no breastfeeding support policies in Canadian resident employment agreements.29 To implement such a policy, residency programs could provide specific private space for breastfeeding/pumping and refrigeration for expressed milk. Program directors and residents could develop an individualized work schedule to accommodate breastfeeding by limiting frequent rotation changes, choosing lighter rotations with no overnight calls initially, working part-time, or doing a research elective after maternity leave.10-13

Another supportive strategy suggested in our study included peer mentorship from past or current breastfeeding residents. Clinic staff physicians and other health care professionals could also help, as studies have shown that supportive work environments and social support facilitate breastfeeding for working mothers.26 Resident wellness programs could also provide access to lactation consultants; however, their recommendations are likely insufficient to sustain longer-term breastfeeding without breastfeeding-friendly work environments. Some participants also reported that they would have liked more formal breastfeeding education. Recent studies reported that residents and physicians have suboptimal breastfeeding knowledge and counselling skills to solve breastfeeding problems.30, 31

Developing and implementing a workplace breastfeeding policy is essential, but a cultural shift in the practice and learning environments is needed first.32, 33 In part, this requires challenging the hidden curriculum, which values subjugating personal needs to professional responsibilities.34, 35 Aligning the formal education of the importance of breastfeeding and questioning the hidden curriculum may promote the health and well-being of breastfeeding residents and their infants. Residents who did not meet their personal breastfeeding goals have reported more sadness, frustration, or depression,9 and lower work satisfaction,8,9 sentiments that were shared by some of our respondents. Evaluations of employment-based breastfeeding support programs reported less absenteeism, better job satisfaction, and higher productivity.36 Importantly, physicians who had positive experiences were stronger breastfeeding advocates for their patients.5, 9

Our study only surveyed residents from the University of Toronto, which has the largest family medicine program in Canada, with 18 teaching sites (including four rural sites). In this pilot study, our response rate was low (31%), and although consistent with online surveys, this may limit our conclusions.37, 38 Unfortunately, we have no information on nonresponders. However, we believe our results are still generalizable, because similar studies since the mid-1990’s have reported the same findings, namely that resident and physician mothers still face the same barriers to workplace breastfeeding.  We do acknowledge that self-selection bias was likely, as residents whose own personal breastfeeding experiences were strongly positive or negative, may have been more likely to participate. Recall errors were also possible, since some residents breastfed their infants almost 7 years ago. In a future Canada-wide survey, we will compare family medicine and specialist residents’ breastfeeding experiences and examine the role of partners and the new Canadian 18-month extended parental leave on maternity leave duration and time to return to full-time work.

Conclusion

Implementing well-established workplace breastfeeding strategies would support future residents, as well as other working mothers in the health care field as they juggle professional priorities with motherhood.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Women’s College Hospital Family Practice Peer Support Writing Group, in particular, Dr Nicholas Pimlott for reviewing the manuscript and providing invaluable feedback and comments. They also thank Dr Mary Ann O’Brien for her expertise on qualitative methodology and for reviewing the draft.

This study was presented at the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine Conference, November 9-12, 2017, Atlanta, Georgia; and Family Medicine Forum, November 14, 2018, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

References

  1. Pound CM, Unger SL; Canadian Paediatric Society, Hospital Paediatrics Section, Nutrition and Gastroenterology Committee. The Baby-Friendly Initiative: Protecting, promoting and supporting breastfeeding. Paediatr Child Health. 2012;17(6):317-327.
  2. Riggins C, Rosenman MB, Szucs KA. Breastfeeding experiences among physicians. Breastfeed Med. 2012;7(3):151-154. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2011.0045
  3. Duke PS, Parsons WL, Snow PA, Edwards AC. Physicians as mothers: breastfeeding practices of physician-mothers in Newfoundland and Labrador. Can Fam Physician. 2007;53(5):887-891, 886.
  4. Sattari M, Serwint JR, Neal D, Chen S, Levine DM. Work-place predictors of duration of breastfeeding among female physicians. J Pediatr. 2013;163(6):1612-1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.07.026
  5. Sattari M, Levine D, Neal D, Serwint JR. Personal breastfeeding behavior of physician mothers is associated with their clinical breastfeeding advocacy. Breastfeed Med. 2013;8(1):31-37. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2011.0148
  6. Miller NH, Miller DJ, Chism M. Breastfeeding practices among resident physicians. Pediatrics. 1996;98(3 Pt 1):434-437.
  7. Sattari M, Levine D, Bertram A, Serwint JR. Breastfeeding intentions of female physicians. Breastfeed Med. 2010;5(6):297-302. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2009.0090
  8. Hutchinson AM, Anderson NS III, Gochnour GL, Stewart C. Pregnancy and childbirth during family medicine residency training. Fam Med. 2011;43(3):160-165.
  9. Dixit A, Feldman-Winter L, Szucs KA. “Frustrated,” “depressed,” and “devastated” pediatric trainees: US academic medical centers fail to provide adequate workplace breastfeeding support. J Hum Lact. 2015;31(2):240-248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334414568119
  10. Walsh A, Gold M, Jensen P, Jedrzkiewicz M. Motherhood during residency training: challenges and strategies. Can Fam Physician. 2005;51:990-991.
  11. Merchant S, Hameed M, Melck A. Pregnancy among residents enrolled in general surgery (PREGS): a survey of residents in a single Canadian training program. Can J Surg. 2011;54(6):375-380. https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.015710
  12. Merchant SJ, Hameed SM, Melck AL. Pregnancy among residents enrolled in general surgery: a nationwide survey of attitudes and experiences. Am J Surg. 2013;206(4):605-610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.04.005
  13. Rangel EL, Smink DS, Castillo-Angeles M, et al. Pregnancy and motherhood during surgical training. JAMA Surg. 2018;153(7):644-652. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.0153
  14. Association of Faculties of Medicine of Canada. Canadian medical education statistics. Volume 38, 2016. https://afmc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/en/Publications/CMES/Archives/CMES2016-reduced.pdf. Accessed April 4, 2019.
  15. Gradstein R. Mothering in medicine: parenting policies in Canadian medical education. Atlantis. 2008;32(2):147-156.
  16. Sanfey HA, Saalwachter-Schulman AR, Nyhof-Young JM, Eidelson B, Mann BD. Influences on medical student career choice: gender or generation? Arch Surg. 2006;141(11):1086-1094. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.141.11.1086
  17. Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM. Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. 4th ed. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.
  18. Government of Canada. EI maternity and parental benefits: What these benefits offer. https://www.canada.ca/en/services/benefits/ei/ei-maternity-parental.html. Accessed November 12, 2018.
  1. United States Department of Labor. FMLA (Family & Medical Leave). https://www.dol.gov/general/topic/benefits-leave/fmla. Accessed November 12, 2018.
  2. Brown CR, Dodds L, Legge A, Bryanton J, Semenic S. Factors influencing the reasons why mothers stop breastfeeding. Can J Public Health. 2014;105(3):e179-85.
  3. Chatterji P, Frick KD. Does returning to work after childbirth affect breastfeeding practices? Rev Econ Househ. 2005;3(3):315–335.
  4. Ogbuanu C, Glover S, Probst J, Liu J, Hussey, J. The effect of maternity leave length and time of return to work on breastfeeding. Pediatr. 2011;127:e1414–e1427. https://doi.org/10.1542%2Fpeds.2010-0459
  5. Guendelman S, Kosa JL, Pearl M, Graham S, et al. Juggling work and breastfeeding: effects of maternity leave and occupational characteristics. Pediatr. 2009;123:e38–e46. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2008-2244
  6. Mandal B, Roe BE, Fein SB. The differential effects of full-time and part-time work status on breastfeeding. Health Policy. 2010; 97:79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2010.03.006
  7. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office on Women’s Health. Breastfeeding support: time and space solutions. 2014. https://www.womenshealth.gov/breastfeeding/employer-solutions/business-case.html. Accessed April 3, 2018.
  8. Johnston M, Esposito N. Barriers and facilitators for breastfeeding among working women in the United States. JOGNN. 2007,36: 9-20.
  9. Mirkovic KR, Perrine CG, Scanlon KS, Grummer-Strawn LM. Maternity leave duration and full-time/part-time work status are associated with US mothers' ability to meet breastfeeding intentions. J Hum Lact. 2014;30(4):416-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334414543522
  10. Sandler BJ, Tackett JJ, Longo WE, Yoo PS. Pregnancy and parenthood among surgery residents: results of the first nationwide survey of general surgery residency program directors. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;222(6):1090-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.004
  11. Gradstein, R. Mothering in Medicine: Parenting Policies in Canadian Medical Education. Atlantis 2008; 32(2):147-156.
  12. Holtzman O, Usherwood T. Australian general practitioners’ knowledge, attitudes and practices towards breastfeeding. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(2):e0191854. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191854
  13. Pound C, Williams K, Grenon R, Aglipay M, Plint AC. Breastfeeding knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and attitudes of Canadian physicians. J Hum Lact 2014,30(3): 298-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334414535507
  14. Dixit A, Feldman-Winter L, Szucs KA. Parental leave policies and pediatric trainess in the United States. J Hum Lact. 2015;31(3):434-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0890334415585309
  15. Humphries LS, Lyon S, Garza R, Butz DR, Lemelman B, Park JE. Parental leave policies in graduate medical education: A systematic review. Am J Surg. 2017;214(4):634-639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.06.023
  16. Mahood S. Medical education: beware the hidden curriculum. Can Fam Physician. 2011; 57(9): 983-985.
  17. Haidet P, Stein HF. The role of the student-teacher relationship in the formation of physicians. The hidden curriculum as process. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(1 Suppl):S16-20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00304.x
  18. Dinour L, and Szaro J. Employer-based programs to support breastfeeding among working mothers: a systematic review. Breastfeed Med. 2017;12(3): 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1089/bfm.2016.0182
  19. FluidSurveys. Response Rate Statistics for Online Surveys -What Numbers Should You be Aiming For? http://fluidsurveys.com/university/response-rate-statistics-online-surveys-aiming/. Accessed April 4, 2019.
  20. National Physician Survey. 2012 Response Rates. http://natioalphysiciansurvey.ca/surveys/2012-survey/response-rates/. Accessed April 4, 2019.

Lead Author

Lina Al-Imari, MD

Affiliations: Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Co-Authors

Susan Hum, MSc - Women’s College Hospital Family Practice Health Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada

Paul Krueger, PhD, MHSc - Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Sheila Dunn, MD, MSc - Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Corresponding Author

Lina Al-Imari, MD

Correspondence: 37 Green Ash Crescent, Richmond Hill, ON, L4B 3S1, Canada. 416-560-7594.

Email: lina.al.imari@mail.utoronto.ca

Fetching other articles...

Mendeley

Loading metrics from Mendeley...

Loading the comment form...

Submitting your comment...

There are no comments for this article.

Downloads & Info

Share

Tags

Searching for articles...